Hoi4 recon worth it. This may be worth the costs, especially for flanking units.

Hoi4 recon worth it The recon bonus is mostly useless, as tests have shown it doesn't really provide any benefit. It's hard to explain, but, for example, it adds the focuses of the DLCs with minimal changes. Recon are good in tanks that you want to make fast encirclements and overruns with, since the division speed +10% is great for getting overruns. It’s a percentage gain, though, so not worth it on slow divisions (infantry, early heavy tanks). But you can make light tanks much cheaper than cars for garrison, and just use the other recon companies like rangers. They provide a 10% speed boost on all terrain except desert and urban. Cavalry are almost always useful for suppression. 8K votes, 184 comments. I use them as a garrison division, I have been playing Hoi4 Day by day, everyday, since May 7th, 2020, ask me anything upvotes Adding light armor recon to your infantry will add several stats, and subtract one key one. Superior firepower as doctrine, and I got rid of any motorized and tanks. Recon. If I'm Italy I always puppet Ethiopia so I don't have to worry so much about that either. You can sometimes get a small amount of extra breakthrough, but it's not the most cost effective way of adding it to divisions. It depends on both the country you pick and the situation you in. Recon and support artillery are solid optionals. See the link below) that the technology "Mobile Infantry" from MW L doesnt increase the speed of motorized recon companies. 15 votes, 35 comments. plus you have so many light tanks that you don't need to produce any (i put a factory on it to be safe though) A few of the hoi4 youtubers seem to think AA on destroyers isn't a necessity. w045 Brand new HOI4 player here (from EU4), Not necessarily, but if you use your tanks as breakthrough units then yes, it’s useless. Hoi4 Tip: Why recon companies are also useful for attack and offense. Especially useful against china who cannot afford anything beyond basic infantry equipment, LT2 tanks used as a recon company can give any division enough armor to secure the armor bonus against divisions that aren't using IE3, infantry anti Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. HOI4 Tools SGr - Save Game Recorder - records, compresses, and archives autosave files in realtime, no 2 really that important? I still can't for the life of me figure out if recon is worth it now and if any of the new recon units are better than the others, apart from their stats outside or recon value. With one operative you can't really do much operations, but it does serve the basic intel needs - and intel does help a lot in my experience, especially in more ahistorical situations. Far better than motorised/cavalry/infantry or recon tanks in tank divisions. They are solid early and mid game options for budget recon companies for any country that does not yet The current consensus is that it is only good for defending with lower-level generals since the real benefit of tactical choice is on the defense. Toggle signature. In the interests of keeping this post focused on the complete comparison, I'll be omitting the basic information included in those posts, but feel free to talk about errors you see in either of those two posts, Because of the small size of the flame tank company, they add very limited stats to the division itself compared to line battalions. But it can be a pain to implement - you can’t have a light tank division that uses one model for the line battalions and a different for the support Aquí nos gustaría mostrarte una descripción, pero el sitio web que estás mirando no lo permite. Recon and engineers are mandatory, artillery as support is good but not as good as a couple of brigades in your template. Because Armored Car Recon is the only one that improves, its the best one to use. The higher movement speed is just too good. If you use them as infantry support tanks however, as some of the majors did historically, it’ll be worth a lot. 3K votes, 100 comments. 🔹 408K subscribers in the hoi4 community. So you still have to mix in infantry or some sort. This won't be problem This may be worth the costs, especially for flanking units. Cavalry honestly might be better if you have low production but high manpower. A few marines division on I'd say sometimes it's worth to have both tactical bombers and CAS, but only rarely: CAS is good in Europe, but lacks range for the bigger regions. Most early game units will not be able to penetrate this. HOI4 for $12 on Humble Bundle - worth it . If not we'll tweak it more. LR and MtG are fine too but not necessary imo. I just focus on the N African coast so I can control the med. A It's a hard problem to fix, to be fair, beacause there was a time in the past when you'd end up with your naval recon tactical bombers reinforcing your close air support tactical bombers, I think now with some MIOs they’re worth doing. 🔹 We are a community built and ran sub. The mechanics are detailed in the wiki here, basically the way it works is the game calculates which side of combat has higher reconnaissance, then gives that side the equivalent of +5 points to the commander's skill level towards choosing tactics. 7 km/h: Motor infantry looks mostly fine, drop the hospital unless you're really, really rich on industry AND light on manpower. ) a light cruiser with radar and float planes operating alone is clearly the best recon option, I build them with 3 float slots, is that too many? Oh I was under the impression that the Recon tech upgrades matters little to Rangers, my bad. Engineers and recon are also considered 'frontline' for the purposes of the superior firepower doctrine, MPs are not. Bad terrain armor unit. DLC's are only worth it if you get them one by one since launch, get some of them on a sale, or if you are really desperate just pirate the game with all the DLC's. In those few cases, they don’t have enough piercing to pierce even that small amount of armor. I've talked about it a lot, but LT2 tanks can be used to bully poor nations or dumb AI. Manpower is more valuable in OWB but it's kind of a toss up between having more firepower via fireteam/demolition to reduce casualties and using that slot for chem. 409K subscribers in the hoi4 community. they arent worth for defensive purpuses as each support company lowers the org of the division significantly. On top of that you get more recon bonus, which should be better since the updated the tactics thing with one of the last patches. WtT - Honestly should be in the base game but oh well. Recon for speed (the recon stat itself sucks). bicycle troops are not worth the money either, slower than motorized, too expensive compared to cav. Use maintain company to boost reliability but don’t go above 100%. But if you are trying to conserve manpower and have the NSB dlc, you can build the cheapest possible light tank with bogie suspension (so it keeps its hardness value) and it will be both cheaper and more effective than armored cars in resistance suppression. For increasing speed and recon bonus. Basically consider using them if In theory, it gives you better odds of choosing tactics that counter your opponents', which could be worth it. Tanks themselves are not just super expensive, but you have to invest into mobilized/motorized units which are also expensive, and on top of that tanks just require soooooo many mils to produce at any reasonable rate. By performing air recon missions you can gather: Civilian Intel: Maximum 25% Army Intel: Maximum 20% Air Intel: Maximum 20%In the Dev Diary, it says: These new planes are not capable of fighting or giving air superiority, but they have a new mission “Air Recon” which can also be performed in peace time. Its all about bringing the right tools for the job. The small combat gain from light tank recon can be useful in light tank divisions, but may not be worth the cost elsewhere, outside of some special cases. Good support companies in singleplayer is support arty, rockets, logistics. If you ever intend to have a unit take a punch, it needs to have Engineering companies. I love using light tank units. The effect also scales to the number of them added to the division. Is it worth it Skip to main Brand new HOI4 player here (from EU4), this might be a very dumb question but is the game just all one war? all the stuff i read seems to imply prepping for this one global war (wwii obv) but like, there's no free for all or anything you basically pick a side -> win/lose -> the end?. Any of the recon companies are going to give you Reconnaissance and a ~10% movement BONUS on land, which the other options you listed would not. Welcome to the Anyway the 'Recon' side of the game was not really worth it pre 1. That’s if you use recon companies anyway. Recon advantage is binary, it doesn't matter whether you have 100 recon or 0. Recon: View attachment 1077103 Rangers. As usa was hoping to split off carrier strike forces under one admiral and bb/ca under another admiral with spotting and raiding fleets under other admirals since the USA start with so many. r/Eldar. I can't entirely tell why you would get them. I'd say: NSB - In my opinion the best/most fun DLC in this game. It revamps the intelligence tree just enough to make it worth it, and also lets you recruit up to five(?) extra spies so you have more flexibility. Although I don’t know the math specifically off the top of my head here’s the community wiki on hoi4 reliability So I've been using Superior Firepower a lot lately, and it just kinda makes tank divisions pale in comparison. A Some stats still get transfered to your division with no maluses, those ones can be worth it to add to your light tank. Armored recon aka light tank recon need around 58% and flame tank around 33%. especially speed variants with a supporting destroyer, AA, and artillery light tank supporting them (all with matching speed boosts). Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size . But the actual support company is a bit of a gimmick for most builds. Cheap soft attack and bonus defence The rest below is situational. In comparison anti tank is well worth it because you get 2 anti tank for every infantry. Recon - Not as good as I always thought Renember that calvary in Hoi4 gets both General traits to work with them. A engineer, maintenance, recon Reply reply Anyone except tiny countries it can be worth it. s. You don’t need nearly as many recon aircraft as you need tactical bombers, Is it worth it to magnetize the turrets on Chaos Rhino? In terms of suppression it has the same value as tanks, however again I don't think it's worth the production cost at all, it's way more cost effective to just use cavalry with MP. This will be based on comparisons detailed in this comment. Light tank recon adds hard attack to tanks, which I have actually never needed. Jan 19, 2010 984 1. Recon is good if the armor template needs to exploit too, but I separate those tasks even when playing minors. more fighters? What is Heavies and armor are not worth it because you can easily get 90-120 piercing with AT, TD or even cannons. They have the highest recon, but motorized isn’t much weaker and is cheaper. So you need to consider the costs (IC, org/armor/hardness/piercing reduction). The only situation where this changes is if you are high production and want to save manpower. Cavalry, Motorized, & Armored Car recon adds soft attack to Line & Support Artillery. 9 update, replacing the previous recon company as long as you have the lar dlc. Thanks Support artillery, engineers and recon are a staple in my infantry setup. so being able to see them gave a feeling of having better recon. Tanks give breakthrough its the same with camels, guess why i will never use camel troops? brcause they are more expensive than cav and they eat more than twice the supply of normal infantry. RECON allows your general to pick better combat tactics when their recon is greater than the opponents (IIRC, if you have the initiative than you have +5 commander skill). Radar station is an intel building mainly used by the United Kingdom in Hearts of Iron IV. Hello, I’m a bit of a novice player still and have been using foot infantry exclusively, with only tanks being brought in recently. The details are about the opposing force. Recon isn't really worth it and the speed (e. Armor/ mechanized/ motorized: support artillery, recon, maintenance, signal company , logistics. 403K subscribers in the hoi4 community. Currently, they are working on their biggest yet HOI4 ever. So I've been using Superior Firepower a lot lately, and it just kinda makes tank divisions pale in comparison. WalrusJones Oct 2 396K subscribers in the hoi4 community. Recon can also benefit exploitation units by Is reconnaissance support even worth it? I use armor reconnaissance and I feel it’s much helpful and makes all my divisions stronger but I feel like I’m missing out on AA or AT or logistics. A (I only make medium tanks), and they have great breakthrough, but I feel like they aren't often worth it. Compare that to a 14/4 infantry division and you 3 - Is ten dedicated scout wings (10 x 10 medium scout = 100 recon equipment) on Air Recon mission as effective as one fighter wing where each fighter has recon equipment (1 x 100 fighter/scout = 100 recon equipment) < > Showing 1-2 of 2 comments . Turrets depends on your production capabilities, but if you want recon tanks i imagine that you will use them for the stats, so the most sensed thing to do is having the best tank possible. Recon, Engineers, Support Arty, Maintenance Company, Signal company. Adds general traits, nice focus tree for Germany/Japan. I recommend buying. It's not worth the micromanagement and the AI sucks. This way you'd even get the speed in every terrain. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Entrenchment went up from 7 to 8, so its worth it. Compare that to a 14/4 infantry division and you If you watch the battle unfold, recon against no recon, you should see Xs popping up on the tactics choices of your opponent more often than they pop up on yours. 396K subscribers in the hoi4 community. Tanks have better stats for pushing. so instead, like every DLC-only feature Recon doesn't win you the tactics war on the offensive. Support Artillery. Tactical bombers are worse than CAS, strategic bombers and heavy naval bombers. For tanks I use recon, engineers, hospitals, logitstics, and maintainance. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. If you do use light tanks, then it’s totally reasonable to design a someone better but expensive version for recon. Reliability is a stat that effects military equipment like planes and tanks attrition modifiers. Early game armor for your infantry. Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. Hits like a brick pushes even crazier, has minor org issues, and rocket arti are for most a bit meh so you can change that with engineer company. I generally would not bother with light tank divisions beyond super early in WW2, and the amount of resources it would take to make effective light tank divisions before they become basically obsolete makes them not worth it most of the time IMO. They are really good stats for the IC for recons. It has worked well for me so far, in local MP as well, but tbh, I don't know if that can be attributed to signal company. They're the worst recon company. I find MP to be useless unless you're using it in garrison divisions for that extra defense. Recon - Not as good as I always thought Stat differences are marginal and you already produced 4 years worth of regular artillery. Can Air Recon detect ships or is it only uses for air tiles over land? Skip to main content. Those are the best and they work in all situation. See the wiki for the Air Recon mission. Supp companies Anti-Air, Artillery, Rocket Artillery, Logistics, Motorized Recon. I find signal companies, while useful, are not useful enough to beat out hospitals. It's probably not worth the cost, unless you're playing on a very limited manpower country and have more industry than you need to equip a manpower-limited army, but not enough research slots or industry to build tanks in high numbers. So I saw this morning that June's Humble Bundle monthly subscription includes HOI4. As for the DLC, none are necessary but all add value. Nah. Ossiv Colonel. Otherwise the benefits won’t help you when your army has no guns. I think you get a bit more hardness compared to motorized, but then if you cared about hardness you’d use light tank for recon. While you can try to take advantage of this, the drop in org and worsened HP ratios aren't really offset by what little the company adds. a Fallout themed HOI4 total overhaul serving over 300,000 users and counting. Still worth it with majors who have tons of factories and recourses? Because of the 100% collaboration I got all Frances' factories and recourses. (XBX,PS4,PC & Stadia) 🔹Please feel free to share, discuss or ask, anything about Ghost Recon: Breakpoint here with your fellow Ghosts and Wolves. It translates to a flat bonus equal to leader skill points. Nav has targeting priorities that heavily favour capitals (BB especially), and ship AA only works 100% when said ship is targeted. I designed 4 width infantry templates which leads to long battles and allows me to observe the tactics chosen. Im not sure why youre comparing a recon company to an artillery battalion. I don’t really know when to use motorized or when to make them. In theory, it gives you better odds of choosing tactics that counter your opponents', which could be worth it. 17 Badges. If you're playing a major power, then medics aren't worth it, cause you have more than enough bodies. don't use armored car recon, especially not as russia. It’s also worth bearing in mind that you don’t have to use every spot. STOP Games on a budget! 💰 Upto 50% off your fav PDX games 🖥️ https://paradoxinteractive. If you don’t use light tanks otherwise, imo the research and army xp costs aren’t worth it just for light tank recon. Make recon light tanks fast and cheap. This is all from playing regularly with 1k+ hour people in MP btw. Its worth it if you play game for less then one year or so. Recon and Garrison templates. BN to pump the armor and/or piercing. After that it depends on the situation whether I'll add dedicated anti tank, AA, logistics or other companies. Then the rest is up to you, It would help to have those popups in the top of the UI, but overall I find the Espionage tedious and handling Resistance a drain, so I liked it more before La Resistance. You lose organization, and it costs more. Rather than paper tanks you can use motorised recon for a lot less effort Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. You have recon where the enemy doesn't know they are being watched, recon where the enemy knows they are being watched and can take measures to conceal but can't stop it, and recon by force where you run hog wild in areas where you know the enemy is but don't think they are concentrated and you can see how long it takes for and how You want the heavy cruisers for the same reason others have commented but also that your capitol ship line screens for your carriers. r/hoi4 A chip A close button. With this, the side with the higher total the Air Recon mission used to gather intelligence from enemy territory; Reconnaissance points, a divisional statistic that is used to select tactics in land combat; The Reconnaissance support company that is used to increase a division's reconnaissance points Cavalry? Motorized? Armored Car or Light Tank? What should I use on an industrialised nation like Germany and why? Help me understand please. Recon advantage is equal to increasing your general skill level by 5 points, for the purposes of selecting tactics. 51 votes, 44 comments. Here's the screenshot to prove it. Certainly not worth the IC I was wondering if using Air Recon was worth while to help scout for ships. Strategic bombing is really only good when you aren’t going to invade and are in some kind of stand off where somehow you have air superiority and don’t have an army yet big enough to invade overall, probably not worth it imo I am not saying that recon is or is not worth it, just that you should be careful testing or watching others make tests. And what are best to get first? I will be able to get a dlc this week and need help deciding which one and maybe what to get I've seen this preference for AC Recon over LT Recon - is this just because the cars are cheaper to produce? Partially yes, but it's also just because armored cars are quite simply the best recon units in the game- they provide an extra 1 recon over light armored recon at every level. I never push forward at all. Though you can make a good argument for switching out the Support art for logistics companies. Initially I thought they were supposed to be an alternative to mobile infantry, but they have the low org and HP of tanks. Recon are also supposed to give you an edge on choice of combat tactics, giving a higher chance to choose the right one to counter enemies' tactic, if memory serves. Each victory point in a providence requires 1 suppression to negate it's resistance buildup, so a providence with 10 VP will take 10 infantry battalions to fully suppress, or 5 cavalry battalions. For fighting in say China or Africa nothing beats tactical bombers as CAS. Armour recon for tank division. After that you should pick only 2 of the remaining so you don't spread too much in the research times. Early war I just run Cav Recon, but late war I upgrade to light armor, using a slow, maxed out armor light tank design. Recon - as you say, helps pick better tactics. The recon support company increases your Intel gain from combat. I should try the best light tank possible to put in recon units in order to support paratroopers. same with field hospitals it doesn't seem worth the IC. This has a maximum value though which can easily be hit without recon. Honestly, I don't notice much of a difference so I generally ignore RECON, but some people swear it's valuable. I personally doesn´t use them at all but it is a good idea to use them as reconnaissance in tank divisions. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. Not as useful as before. If you are struggling with low fuel supply or But no on leg infantry since a ~10% movement bonus isn't worth it. I intentionally made the title inflammatory to hopefully draw more attention and actually get some discussion going. If you can afford it, take the 3 man turret, otherwise 2 or 1; Radio in my opinion are always worth more than anything else unless it's a SPG; Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. Divs can be small (10-15w) and still hold. Leg infantry; drop the motor recon for cav recon. 5 civs for a month gives you an operative you can use forever, so it's pretty cheap. In HoI4 it will be no different. Always 20-width. The flamers should be used on offensive units, but that’s just meta and not everybody wants to It's on my list to do a guide, but at the moment, I'm not sure MAINT is a good choice in a lot of cases. It is also very Your dedicated recon aircraft is a medium airframe with a recon camera attached, that comes in wing sizes of 10, and nothing else on it. Include engineer, light tank recon, logistics, signal, and maintenance companies and you're good to go. Some people say it does help, some people say it's not worth it. If your country is lucky u can get both Infantry expert and Calvary expert. Higher chance to reinforce is nice, but only necessary if you want to do mass encirclements using battleplans wiithout microing. Certainly not worth the IC I think armored car reconaissance is the best recon company. e. The recon stat itself is of questionable value. 1 - Just add motorised recon to moto division so it can fill gaps and exploit holes in Based on this I designed a test to determine the value of recon. That means that every division needs fuel for armor (for some reason). As recon support company, it has the best reconnaissance bonus. C. You need to have as much org as possible if you wanna survive the endless braindead ai offensives they do over and over again. The game is on sale and I was wondering if the base game was worth it? Skip to main content. A place With the semi-recent update to the level structure and costs, I thought it would be worth putting together a plot to highlight when it does and doesn't make sense to build it, and have some actual numbers to back that up. Support artillery. And then you get the training time penalty. Report. 17 votes, 12 comments. Stack all that entrenchment. Their initiative boost is not a recon advantage (which is underwhelming BTW), but planning speed and reinforce rate bonus. Superior firepower is the worst option for line artillery In the way it makes the least sense to use line artillery with superior. So i know that The MEFO bills helps keep it a secret that you’re building your military, but does that really matter? I don’t want to cripple myself by constantly extending them and then having to pay them eventually. Whichever side has the higher recon value has the recon advantage. Playing any paradox game without DLC's is like eating a burger that is only buns. And what are best to get first? I will be able to get a dlc this week and need help deciding which one and maybe what to get Go to hoi4 r/hoi4. The third time I use maximized signal companies together with 1942 radar tach, to give the greatest possible amount of coordination. The recon stat itself is useless, so all other recon companies are garbage. Once Modern tanks become available, swapping over is definitely worth it. Also, cavalry recon and motorized recon are far better than F tier. I typically run my paratroopers with Engineers, double support Arty (if I have rocket tech), recon and, if I went paratrooper doctrine, hospital. However, but I think already with frequency alterations it will be useful enough to make recon worth it. Infantry leader and Calvary leader both add bonuses. Hello there! Reply. No need to leave it out really as it's not a significant cost increase. 408K subscribers in the hoi4 community. Brand new HOI4 player here (from EU4), 15 votes, 13 comments. I still really like AA support against the axis. If you have a stockpile and good production, it’s worth it. But yes, it also has to do with the production. The vast majority of defense tactics don't have counters and therefore don't penalize their selection with lower recon. Reply reply More replies More replies More replies. I just produce light tanks for the better recon support modules. net/OrGbvn WHY You Should NEVER Use Recon - HOI4 Support C What will you give up, recon, initiative, supply, soft attack, bonuses on rough terrain? Manpower is the trickiest resource in the game, but it's a means to an end, Not sure if it'll be worth it. When I play as Germany, my infantry divisions have the following support companies: ENG, ART, AT RECON, and LOG. Reply reply [deleted] • The more But this is Hoi4 AI after all, and as they are changing the combat widths there are a lot of variables. So I had to use Light Tank recon or Armored car recon. Since HOI4 is made by paradox it doesn't matter that it came out in 2016 they have continued to update the game and release DLC. As for the Reich Aquí nos gustaría mostrarte una descripción, pero el sitio web que estás mirando no lo permite. 162. HOI4 basically forbid historical designs for The alternative would be to make them as cheap as possible to at least get the recon stat up and the movement bonuses ofc. Field Hospitals - essential for smaller nations and good for bigger nations but their impact is really only felt in really long wars where you take little casualties and get really good experience from them. 2. 406K subscribers in the hoi4 community. Logistics. Just use tanks. Would you say LT recon is worth it then, if it can be afforded? Normally I put my old light tanks into recon roles after my mediums begin rolling out. Light tank recon is okay if you have light tanks lying around, but only for stat padding. we pay 1€ each everytime we want to buy it and since we dont play enough to make buying all the dlcs worth it its a sweet deal for us. View attachment 1077104 Marines Combo Rangers and Pioneers. As well as this the naval combat is far more effort than it is worth and investing time into it will not really be too rewarding or fun. My first succesful run as USSR, I took Poland, and only built 20w inf with supp aa, art, eng, rocket, recon. Aside from really good recon support, What? No they're not. those are shown by clicking the battle icon. They also slightly increase division defence and attack. You can also see enemy ships, and their task forces if you have recon planes over an ocean. When that's the case, it can be worth spending more (than trucks) to get better stats without increasing combat width. (Update it if you learn something!) But to save you a trip, there's nothing more there than has already been posted in this thread. That or make tank divs specifically designed to counter tanks. Not every land doctrine gives access to every tactic/counter tactic and certain general/field marshal traits change the chance of picking specific tactics (i. By recon I don't mean recon companies, I mean the recon stat itself. One will have to go, since apprently SIG is a must have in NSB. Beyond that, the bonuses you get from broken ciphers and intelligence networks is handy for invasions, and preparing a collaborationist government before the war can save you a huge amount of pain later on when resistance gets It isn't literally DLCs. Recon is primarily a defensive aid, and rarely does it pay off. Just switch an infantry to a light armor or uae armored recon. is there any general consensus on the use of armored cars in division line slots Yes. 1. It doesn’t matter if all you can afford is the cavalry. For me it was kinda worth since I always loved Portugal as a minor, and Spain and France seem much more fun, and I also thought the spy thingy would be very fun. When it comes to the Recon Companies themselves, the best one has to be the Light Armored Recon Company. In this mod, you can go to monarchism, democracy and communism, which is what basically the DLCs add to Germany. Recon is in a good place in vanilla HOI4 currently, it gives ok buffs and the artillery buff it got makes it critical to pushing divisions using a lot of line artillery. Reconnaissance (REC): A recon company provides a speed bonus on most terrain and a reconnaissance points bonus to the commander that increases the chance to counter the tactic chosen by the enemy for a day of combat. I think you might have heard that from someone talkimg about feedbackgamings heavy tank armor meta, which is bad. AA on screens or ships not being targeted contribute towards fleet AA, but only a portion of the AA stats. If its attack infantry, and you use it for different types of terrain, then yeah, its worth it. So light armor recon becomes very valuable. 16 votes, 50 comments. in a tank division) can be applied cheaper by hitting the +button next to 'engine' in the tank designer. The usual self-hating nonsense from people who'll have played 8000 hours of HOI4 yet insist it has "no replay value". Same with light tank recon, which doesn't add armor to the division anymore. 5 reconnaissance whereas others gives only 1. Mediums are ideal but personally I mainly use light flame tanks to make use of old chassis I have in storage. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game hmm ok then maybe Recon is worth the terrain bonuses on its own Reply reply More replies More replies More replies. Reply reply Theres a million ways to play HOI4 but, maintenance companies definitely have their place IMO. Reply reply w0lf2683 Im not sure why youre comparing a recon company to an artillery battalion. Here's why: 1 you need to get better artillery before it's worth it over infantry. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Hearts of Iron IV by In game equivalent of such a division would be 9 inf, 3 art, support AT, AA, field hospital, armored recon, signal, engineers, military police and maintenance (plus some others that don't exist in-game). Long range, light airframes culminating in the Seiran multipurpose recon bomber. It was a pure infantery army. In reality, it seems like a coinflip. More support companies means less organization, and you need organization if you want your troops to stay in the fight. If you want to use that support company. Reply reply More replies. 47 votes, 32 comments. A recon, engineer, repair and anti tank. Why is my Hoi4 game so slow after 1940 ? I was investing battalions a bit on the HoI4 Wiki and I noticed there are four different recon companies available: Cav, Mot, AC, The new recon types have been added in the 1. Recon by force is a very real thing. Chinese minor have it and Poland also have it. But from what I understand, carrier group aircraft target all your capitals first. Supp art is very efficient soft attack, but tanks should already have plenty of that. In most situations, the armored car will be outclassed or simply not appropriate for the terrain. There is no separate accounting for information discovered 2. Placing it on recon or flame tanks is the best place to put it initially, generally it's your light tanks conducting exploitation in the first place. There are actually 3 distinct things that people seem to put under the single 'recon' umbrella. This way you get a light, strong and cheap unit with rather high soft attack for motorized attacks in large areas with low supply Having to import double these resources for the army as well is generally not worth it. The mechanics of recon are such that higher Plenty of people consider the REC to not be worth the decrease in certain stats as it too heavily relies on external factors to be consistently useful and there are better ways to Reconnaissance advantage is determined by comparing the sum of recon values in all divisions in combat of each side. That’s not very good, except vs early China and some minors. I usually use Recon Companies as they’re dead cheap and have movement bonuses but when it gets to 39, 42 I rarely bother researching the upgrade. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Hearts of Iron IV by Paradox Development Studio. It was like 3 months ago. Generally, you should never build divisions in HOI4 without a Recon Company as Support. I almost steamrolled Germany with battleplan activated. If you have lots of Power Armor in stock might be worth using PA support. Anybody have any recommendations on how to use the scout planes? I've made some small air divisions of 25 planes and been flying them around but it's So as a rule of thumb one point of anti air means 0,13 planes killed per day of combat meaning that even a basic support AA can "pay itself" in a little more than 3 days of combat, ignoring some other great advantages like the 75% damage reduction, I guess it's a strong argument to put in pretty much any offensive division that will se any kind of air combat, although I rarely see the 20w Infantry or PA with recon and anti-tank are good enough if you are advanced. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. It’s not worth it if you’re in a deficit of guns. If you do things right u can cheese ai with 70% from general. The amount of org and def you lose in exchange for soft attack isnt worth it until artillery 3s. So does that mean one strike force fleet (one admiral) can respond to a separate recon fleet (another admiral) spotting enemy ships. Get piercing (cheap af recon tanks or antitank guns) to deal with the eventual german tank offensives. Drop the recon and replace it with Engineers (for very good defensive bonuses / entrenchment) 1934 heavy tanks are they worth it or should I try rushing the heavy tank after them? (IN MULTIPLAYER) You should always use Recon, Field Hospital and Engineer on all of your fighting troops and MP on your Garrison. With Recon company, your It is good in 2 ways - to make your speedy bois even more speedier or to boost your infantry division. I do replace them with a couple dedicated AA light cruisers to bring the average back up. My standard set up for infantry is recon, engineers, and artillery, with hospitals/logistics if I can afford it. It has the best Reconnaissance stat (+4), along with good Armor and extra Breakthrough stats. 4K votes, 177 comments. I would say its never really worth it to use MPs. The rest is a waste of troop and material. Lights are cheaper and don't take as much terrain attrition damage as mediums or heavies. It also adds some techs, but I think they didn't add mechanics. 54 Badges. They can have an entire line of multipurpose seaplane recon/bombers that work wonderfully from low cost seaplane bases. ) how effective are land based scout planes for naval reconnaissance? Are they really worth building for this purpose 2. In vanilla HOI4, you only get fascist germany. Don't use them. So no, they are the absolute worst plane type possible and are never worth. As title suggests, how do scout planes work? Do I just deploy a couple per battlefield, or is it analogous to how air Additionally, recon companies can help to counter enemy tactics, should their tactics have counters available. 5 recon more than your opponent, the advantage you get is the same. Is more, in terms of support such as recon, medics, artillery always better? No. Also I checked and you can upgrade the arty as the aupport arty gives bounds. As such, it's very cheap to build and only requires one SF integrated support gives a premium benefit from using armored recon, which is 16 attack without width. The side with more reconnaissance points receives a flat bonus equivalent to 5 leader skill points. If speed isn't a concern, flame tanks would also be better value than arty for attack. When compared to just normal light tanks they seem weaker, even if they are cheaper. Is the production going into them worth it when compared with spamming e. But still reconnaissance doesn´t do much in hoi4. For minors I like doing light tanks and then adding a MED TD or SPAG. Most underdeveloped regions of this game don’t worth it. They are particularly useful as armored recon for attacking divisions because armored recon is THE most cost efficient way to add breakthrough to a division. i would recommend only putting engineer + anti air as support companies. A dozen low strength infantry divisions to just hold that area. At the tip of a thrust, the limiting factor can be the combat width rather than the number (and thus cost) of divisions. Reply reply I've heard some great things about HOI4, but a lot of people have said the game feels sort of unfinished without the expansion packs. g. Take all these factors into account and decide if they're worth it to you on the front. You can see the stats boost that the recon tanks in the template. That's 8 support companies. Recon stat (and companies that provide it), initiative, and tactics. A ADMIN MOD Is Motorized Rocket Artillery worth it? Question Lately I have found myself using more and more, I have Support is recon, shovel, car fixer, and logistics. Reply. Agreed on the usability of cav recon in general, if there's industry to spare then it's good on defensive battles for some chance to roll better tactics. You don’t have time to devlop and there is a lot of devloped regions with an high amount of ressource. They have lower attack, breakthrough hardness and armor. View attachment 1077105 To contextualize i didnt unlocked all special forces tree yet: View attachment 1077106 View attachment 1077107 Basically, artillery isn't worth building in the vast majority of situations. I'm thinking RECON is the one to get rid of. From what I can tell it just improves ur use of tactics which I have no influence over. You can add anything you want; you literally DESIGN the template, and tune Recon are definitely worth it. Anti-Tank is an overkill for single player, unless you need dedicated infantry divisions with AT to counter otherwise unpearceable armor. A but other than adding a bonus to fighters, I don't know what they do. The rest of the time, it’s not really worth it unless Thanks for the reply. For armor, I go with engineers, recon, maintenance. I Like to own stuff and dont pay monthly so i buy dlc Reply reply If you play hoi4 alot, subscriptions will total to more than the DLCs. If you want to bleed the enemy, which is great if you want to drain the enemy manpower, support artillery are great. I would also ditch the support arty, add a logistics company for supply savings, and a motor recon company for the extra speed on a lot of terrains. In basegame hoi4 people did the math and the equivalent of Chem support apparently isn't worth it in terms of experience/manpower saved. I usually use Recon in standard Inf for fluff and signal in But are Cavalry worth it? I make a 10 width with two variants recon and MP and refit when needed. That's just not worth the slot IMO. 3. I would almost never refit ships because I read somewhere that it wasn’t worth it, but after playing and realizing I can never build my navy to the task forces I wanted, it seemed like refitting was necessary. 398K subscribers in the hoi4 community. No, the 2 canal are important. They have 2x the reconnaissance than infantry and +33% than recon tanks. 346 votes, 75 comments. So you can safely ignore them, unless you really want to make a armored car division and watch the cars drive around africa for whatever reason. If you need recon, add it. Short before Barb I looked at my tank divisions and saw that my Tanks can move only with 10. You will add: a modest amount of soft attack and breakthrough, piercing, armor, recon, and speed. O. Brand new HOI4 player here (from EU4), It seems reasonable to go Field Hospitals in this situation, but seeing as many things in Hoi4 are not really intuitive, I was wondering whether it is the correct choice. But as a play, you can pretty much build it with any country of choose. Some swear by it, some swear against it, but neither side has really presented any data to make a more absolute determination one way or the other. Founding one is definitely worth it. Are they worth the research/construction? Archived post. It also takes huge bonuses The second time was with 1941 radar techs, to see if coordination without being boosted by signal companies is worth anything. Same for armored recon. In terms of what type of recon, by including armored recon on motorized infantry (rather than motorized recon), you can make a poor man's space marines of sorts by including armored recon for it's small armor value. Nov 19, 2022; so unfair, pay to win, rabble rabble. Some people in multiplayer build a few armored cars purely to use the recon support company in their tank divisions. high armor flame tanks do provide a good amount of armor, but only if the division has fuel. Just make fighters with a photo camera installed. Throw in Flamethrowers for extra breakthrough, and cyber-dogs if you can get cyber dogs. If resources are slim just make less of them and use them as elite units for important front lines Reply reply [deleted] • I B. Its worth making light tanks with some effective stats as they can provide decent boosts to piercing, armour and breakthrough. Dedicated AA ship is only worth it for capitals. HOI4 IS RADAR WORTH? Because motorized recon company gives 1. Some things in it are good on paper, like the flavour text for spy missions, but it's just a few variants of the same and not worth reading after the first few times. Stat differences are marginal and you already produced 4 years worth of regular artillery. Which is why I think the extra ammo is so worth it. In terms of divs id suggest lots of artillery on your inf divs. The only thing they are better at is range compared to cas, but their range is worse than both strategic bombers and heavy naval bombers. Heavy fighters are kind of situational but I end up building those to deal with certain fronts. 9, to explain in a basic manner. the desert in which you are suppsoed to use them in is a low ass supply zone so they are effectively obsolete. My question is, those recon division are worth enough to use it?. Its not really worth it, the focus trees are good however the countries aren't the funnest to play, and I find them far less rewarding than Kaiserreich trees. Artillery is the best weapon for shredding enemy infantry. You can even see enemy divisions that are far away from the border. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Armor is typically going to be a much bigger factor. I replace signal with maintainance. TfV - Mostly for the autonomy system, I can't play without it honestly. They're a breakthrough battalion that is actively bad at breakthrough. . But you can go low reliability on support recon and flame tank since it’s use low amount of equipment on that division. As infantry are the slowest units, recon’s speed is least useful here, and is not worth the cost. Cream127 Private. If you're planning to buy, the sites which sell keys sell La resistance for 4 - 8€, which is still better than the sale on steam Recon as a stat is practically worthless, recon as a company is largely only worth it for either the speed or the organization in an SF tank division. I don't have a general design template but I usually do around 8-12 batallions, sometimes some motorized artillery batallions, obligatory AA, Recon, the rest depend on fuel reserves/econ/if you'll used them to hold lines: Engineers and Logistics supports. I've personally never been a fan of recon, but I'm open to being wrong with the new tactics changes. Build a template that has some good range and a recon camera, then build like ten of them. Some of the upgrades increase the relevant stats. Hospitals just sadly aren't worth it in the vast majority of situations. It also makes your divisions slower, as division speed is based on the slowest equipment in the This may be worth the costs, especially for flanking units. Preamble. You set them on the air recon mission, then you should see enemy units popping up on the air zone on which your scout planes are on, even if you don’t have divisions on the border. I use a good 40 width medium tank and motorized template, so it's not the template that is making me questioning their usefulness. So more isn't necessarily better. The recon stat itself is arguably useless, and at worst possibly detrimental. A place to share content, If you have 10k IC cost worth of ships to build, whether you put the battleships on the front or back end of that is irrelevant to when it’s all 1. For the most Notably, the modern tank turret allows you to mount a heavy cannon, and the modern chassis has the armor of a heavy tank but the speed, reliability, and cost of a medium. So, is radar really worth building in HOI4?The answer is simple. But this is never worth it in of itself, since support arty is so much better in this Yes, recon can help counter a preferred enemy tactic, but you could also prefer the counter or a powerful defensive tactic to begin with. More posts you may like r/Eldar. oh sure. These are worth their weight in gold. Cavalry/motorized recon for infantry. Motor recon burns fuel, and a division running out of fuel imposes huge penalties to the entire division. i38e. Not sure how much that's worth though. If it's just the flame tank in a division with no other sources of fuel consumption, the extra fuel capacity can be a noticeable difference, but if you're not adding fuel drums to the medium tanks in the tank division, the extra capacity added by the flame tank will not make more than a few hours difference for the When it comes to the Recon Companies themselves, the best one has to be the Light Armored Recon Company. This is an update to this post to give more complete insight into what recon/initiative does to tactics. p. You don’t want to lose tank to attrition since tank is expensive. Otherwise I don't are about it at all. Recon is a role you add onto a regular plane now. tactics being used for both sides are shown, and there is a list of all possible tactics to look at by clicking the button for it. Best to have both you and your heavy enemy pierced except your tanks are 3 times cheaper. Entrenchment is a great stat. the recon stat is pretty useless meaning it's mainly just good for the other stats, and light tank recon will be far better in that regard. If you need AA, add that too. If you notice in the land doctrine trees you unlock certain special attack or defense choices along the way. 🔹Official fan home of Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Breakpoint. 20w Special forces might work for certain nations that get buffs for them. Anti-Air is fantastic, it shoots down tons of CAS and reduces the enemy air superiority penalty. Combat Tactics did not re-roll often enough and when they did they frequently would get 'locked' in to phases which limited the combat tactics which could be chosen. This is added to the commander's skill level when determining which side picks their tactics second; the side that picks first has a disadvantage because the It doesn't matter how much higher your recon is than the enemy, only that it's higher. Top 1% Rank by size . I think armored car reconaissance is the best recon company. Also since you are playing Japan I’d recommend putting some torpedo boats in there (take the focus for the long lance) as the whole point of the meta is to destroy the screens so fast with light attack that your torpedos can hit the enemy capitols. I have no armored cars and no IC to waste, so I chose light tank recon. 1xp for +1 breakthrough is a pretty good deal. r/hoi4. The rest is pretty situational based on IC and opponent. I’ve seen that the others recon division gives a double of reconnaissance or a half more, but those divisions consume oil, and with some countrys that would be worthless and making the game too difficult. It the extra 2 reconnaissance worth it. Mechs aren't usually worth it if you are able to build tanks. aggressive assaulter makes you pick shock/assault At that point strat bombers are probably better spent on other things like your army that are going to win the war. If you intend for a unit to move forward, then a Recon company is worth it. I'd even consider it a must-have right now. The tech at tier 2 gives you the option to make tanks cheaper. A Is it worth having both support artillery and artillery battalions in the case of attacking with infantry or is the (light tanks/self propelled gun/motorized + engineer support, artillery support and armored recon support) in the early game and transition to 13/7 tanks (medium tanks Infantry: support artillery, engineers, recon, field hospital, logistics. Also Rangers are stupid good after you get them their buffs, only problem is the speed limit they have. pxoi amsjpn ktvsnasx kcfqf xlhg xuyq njnv fbh rcuy pqdlv